Category Archives: Future Generations

Bostonians, This Was Not Cool! Disgraced Desegrated Deflowered Defamed, Paul Revere is Turning in His Grave!

from Wiki.answers.com;

What was the coercive act of parliament in 1774?
Answer:
The Coercive Acts:

Also known as the Intolerable Acts or restraining acts, were enforced in the colonies in 1774 from England under the rule of King George III.
· These acts are a combination of the following: Boston Port Act, Quartering Act, Admin of Justice Act, and the Massachusetts Act.
· With the main port closed, colonies like NY losing gov. power, and the quartering act taking away rights of landowners, the acts urged the colonies to gather and assemble the first continental congress.

Listen to the sounds, the pounding on the door, the helicopter hovering, the barked orders to keep their hands up, and then the sound of spring birds chirping as this desecration of liberty unfolds surreality down the street into hundreds of families homes as Bostonians are forced from their homes in all states of dress and undress, many shoeless, most speechless and frightened out of their ‘sheltering in place’ homes that they’ve already been confined to in the operation’s edict to wait to be ‘rescued’ by the military/swat/police/authorities.

 

What King George III failed to do has been accomplished by our own ‘protectors’. Sad, sad, sad, portentous event, shameful for all the world to see this disgraceful drill acted out in the name of ‘safety and security’.bostonmil12

 

bostonmil6

This was a seeming lark for these men, but make no mistake this was no harmless exercise.

bead

Looking out your window and having this pointed at you was nothing less that martial law threatening you with your life if you dared to make a ‘suspicious’ move. ‘Freeze’! Is the implied command.

bostonmil5

Your only course of action was to take your shoeless coatless children out into the street to be frisked and searched while the ‘protectors’ rifled through your entire home and belongings.

Saddest of all was the gratefulness Bostonians expressed toward the whole sorry affair…………

Bostonians, This Was Not Cool! Disgraced Desegrated Deflowered Defamed, Paul Revere is Turning in His Grave!

 

http://www.infowars.com/video-swat-police-gunpoint-raids-in-boston-were-conducted-house-after-house/

Looking More and More Like Jim Rodgers Agriculture Farmer Advice Is Great

Jim Rodgers has been telling everyone in the world to look to agriculture and hard assets to invest in and that farmers will be the ones driving Lamborghinis in the next 20 to 30 years.

Rodgers’ Investment views from;

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Rogers

In 2002, Rogers said that Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan’s “reaction to the stock-market bubble has caused two more bubbles to grow: a real-estate bubble and a consumer-debt bubble.”[14] In 2006, Rogers said he was shorting US financials, home builders and Fannie Mae.[15][16]On November 4, 2010, speaking at Oxford University’s Balliol College, Rogers urged students to scrap career plans for Wall Street or the City, London’s financial district, and to study agriculture and mining instead. “The power is shifting again from the financial centers to the producers of real goods. The place to be is in commodities, raw materials, natural resources.”[17]In May 2012 he remarked during an interview with Forbes Magazine that “there’s going to be a huge shift in American society, American culture, in the places where one is going to get rich. The stock brokers are going to be driving taxis. The smart ones will learn to drive tractors so they can work for the smart farmers. The farmers are going to be driving Lamborghinis. I’m telling you. You should start Forbes Farming.”[18]

 

But seriously folks, not everyone can or wants to follow his advice and move to Singapore like he did;  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Rogers

[…]In December 2007, Rogers sold his mansion in New York City for about 16 million USD and moved to Singapore. Rogers claimed that he moved because now is a ground-breaking time for investment potential in Asian markets. Rogers’s first daughter is now being tutored in Mandarin to prepare her for the future. He is quoted as saying: “If you were smart in 1807 you moved to London, if you were smart in 1907 you moved to New York City, and if you are smart in 2007 you move to Asia.” In a CNBC interview with Maria Bartiromo broadcast on May 5, 2008, Rogers said that people in China are extremely motivated and driven, and he wants to be in that type of environment, so his daughters are motivated and driven. He also stated that this is how America and Europe used to be. He chose not to move to Chinese cities like Hong Kong or Shanghai due to the high levels of pollution causing potential health problems for his family; hence, he chose Singapore. He has also advocated investing in certain smaller Asian frontier markets such as Sri Lanka and Cambodia, and currently serves as an Advisor to Leopard Capital’s Leopard Sri Lanka Fund.[8] However, he is not fully bullish on all Asian nations, as he remains skeptical of India’s future – “India as we know it will not survive another 30 or 40 years”.[9] In 2008 Rogers endorsed Ron Paul for President of the United States.[10][…]

 

But…………the signs are everywhere that this financial age is ending and the jobs and occupations of the future will not follow the post WW2 ‘upwardly mobile’, ‘rat race’ that has lead to our IT world that really does not need humans to function. So to survive our progeny our will have to look at different models of employment, investment, and survival. The future is hot on our tails………..

Traditional jobs just keep on being ‘farmed out’ to anyone who will accept the ‘opportunity’ to undercut the current holder of the job.  Just one example from Canada;

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2013/04/05/bc-rbc-foreign-workers.html

[…]Dozens of employees at Canada’s largest bank are losing their jobs to temporary foreign workers, who are in Canada to take over the work of their department.[…]

This despite Canada’s workers’ protection guidelines,

[…]Displacement against rulesHowever, it is against federal rules for any company to bring foreign workers into Canada temporarily if it will put citizens out of work.“The rules are very clear. You cannot displace Canadians to hire people from abroad,” said Immigration Minister Jason Kenney.[…]

(Of course these undercutter job replacers will be disposed of by computer and robotics ASAP in the already begun robot age).

 

A world without humans? Not happening, but those PTB are crazy to try their experiments in eugenics and robotics, so the illusion of the modern world is soon breaking down to the realities of the thread of life here on this beautiful sustaining earth.

As Pearl S. Buck wrote, Good Earth
Good Earth, it would be good to get to know it. We’re made of it, it feeds us, and it will receive us in the end.

Feminism 2.0 (Sheryl Sandberg Feminist “Lean In” Author vs Anne-Marie Slaughter, Princeton professor and former top State Department official) Memes for Worker Bees

Feminism 2.0 (Sheryl Sandberg Feminist “Lean In” Author vs Anne-Marie Slaughter, Princeton professor and former top State Department official) Memes for Worker Bees 

This represents a Hobson’s Choice. The absence of a third way, a traditional wife and mother role from this debate seems to assume that is an impossible or passe, old fashioned choice.

Sheryl Sandberg, Facebook, Silicon Valley executive manager and author of “Lean In”, sponsored, launched, or interviewed by

Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, at the offices of the Bloomberg Foundation, on East 78th Street, NY, NY

CBS Program, “60 Minutes”

Time Magazine,

“Makers,” a new documentary on feminist history,

Debora L. Spar, president of Barnard College, who invited Ms. Sandberg to deliver a May 2011 commencement address about gender in the workplace

Cosmopolitan magazine ( which is publishing a 40-page supplement to its April issue devoted to Ms. Sandberg’s ideas, and plan to spread her message to community colleges),

Jill Abramson, the executive editor of The New York Times,

Rachel Sklar, founder of a networking list for women in technology, who is on the Lean In launch committee,

and many other mainstream media outlets plus,

World Economic Forum in Davos, Ms Sandberg  spoke on the topic at the World Economic Forum in Davos last month.

Sheryl Sandberg, “Women in management positions show less flexibility to move to other companies and new areas of responsibility than men, which hampers careers. Little American boys can imagine becoming president, but little American girls cannot.”

vs

Anne-Marie Slaughter (Princeton professor and former senior adviser to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton)

Sandberg’s focus, women’s lagging ambition vs. men (“We will never close the achievement gap until we close the ambition gap,” she has said), “is a much, much smaller problem than our social and political structures,” Slaughter contends. Sandberg’s message, she adds, “isn’t taking account of the full spectrum of women who are not superhuman and rich. Sheryl Sandberg is both superhuman and rich.”

and

 Atlantic Magazine article titled, “Why Women Can’t Have It All,” last year arguing that feminism — and Ms. Sandberg — were holding women to unattainable standards.

Women Don’t Need to “Lean In” More; Powerful Men Need to Reach Out ,  Avivah Wittenberg-Cox, a consultant who works with companies to improve their gender balance.

Fortune magazineSlaughter vs. Sandberg: Can women have it all?

By Patricia Sellers June 25, 2012,    “Is this a “face-off,”, as the New York Times proclaimed, between two elite, superstar women about what is right or wrong with workaday lives and careers? “It’s a debate about how we solve a common problem,”….. “Since then, both women quietly developed perhaps the most notable feminist row since Ms. Friedan refused to shake Gloria Steinem’s hand decades ago.”

Betty Friedan’s “The Feminine Mystique,” and Gloria Steinem’s MS magazine worked for the same goal, their methods squabbles not withstanding caused great upheavals of traditional human society were two sides to the coin of male/female work place relations, occupations, and personal relations.

(In a related development the Queen of England at age 86 has just this week announced her support for gender equality thereby opening up the throne to women succession. I wonder why the “old girl”, is doing this at this late date? Speculate, speculate, speculate………in any case there is only one crowned head at a time, not much room at the top…….anywhere in the world, is there?)

And finally that reminds me. There are few corner offices and even fewer penthouse offices for anyone to attain. So why train so many for the race to the top at all? Is it a question of conditioned obedience to the corporate model?

worker bees?

Yes, that must be it. I like honey quite a lot, but I’m not envious of those creatures at all, bee society doesn’t appeal to me in the least! But UN Agenda 21 proponents think the hive is grand. Yet that is a failed philosophy built upon a reprobate misunderstanding of the very nature of humans. In the end we aren’t bees and can never be contained in the planned communities Agenda 21 daydream.

What few women and men attain to the lofty goals of both Ms Sandberg and Professor Slaughter might examine whether the sacrifices they advocate to get to the CEO Suite give life meaning or simply lead to regrets of lost opportunities for more valuable experiences in the wider world of existence for the sake of breath itself.

I don’t believe many were meant to rule, the air is too thin for most up there on the top floor. Even if you reach Mt. Everest you can’t live there very long and would you, if you could……in any event it’s the climb and the companions that make for a successful contented happy life, and sometimes its the view, but often even that is obscured, then a kind word and a hot cup of coffee or tea would make all the difference……………

Rand Paul Filibuster and Terrible Media Coverage

In 13 hour Senate Filibuster Rand Paul asks ONE question of Obama Administration.

“Do you have the Constitutional power to use a drone to kill a US citizen on US soil?”

“No.” Should have been the answer, but instead we get legalese that proclaims power to provisionally decide to kill a US citizen on US soil with a drone.

Mike Adams says,    http://www.infowars.com/its-now-clear-obama-intends-to-use-drone-strikes-to-kill-american-journalists-and-political-enemies/

[…]The American “battlefield” doctrine and the NDAA

In defending the drone assassination powers of the President, you might hear language used that says drones will “only be used on the battlefield.” That seems to imply they will only be used in the Middle East, right?

Wrong. The USA has been legally defined as the new “battlefield” by the NDAA. That’s theNational Defense Authorization Act which also allows for the arrest and indefinite detention of American citizens without trial, without legal representation and even without them ever being charged.

The USA is the new “battlefield,” and when you combine the NDAA and the DOJ’s new drone killing justification memo, you now have the claimed legal framework for any American on U.S. soil to be arrested, detained, tortured or blown to bits without warning and without even a single shred of evidence being presented against him.

Yes, this is America today. Right now. You are living under a military dictatorship and most of you don’t even realize it yet. Even liberals and progressives are starting to wake up to Obama’s tyranny, by the way. On Democracy Now, Daniel Ellsberg recently described Obama’s actions as a “systematic assault on the Constitution.”

Who are the terrorists?

Of course, anyone who raises these points will be immediately dismissed with the claim that all this new power in the hands of the President will only be used “against terrorists.”

Okay, then who are the terrorists, exactly? It turns out they are YOU!

As Judge Napolitano recently explained:

The [Janet Napolitano DHS] memorandum said that people who are pro-life, people who believe in the right to keep and bear arms, returning veterans, people who think the government is too big and the IRS is too powerful, could be characterized as domestic terrorists. That could characterize two-thirds of the country. (Click here to see related video.)    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwJb5pbWhe4   […]

[…]All that is necessary to justify the murder of American citizens without trial is labeling them “terrorists” even with no evidence to support such a claim. The drone killings require no evidence. They only require the signature of one man.

Who is likely on the drone strike target list in the USA

So who is most likely to be assassinated by President Obama once drone strikes are fully unleashed in the USA?

• Journalists.
• Political opponents.
• Anti-government protesters. (One Hellfire missile takes ‘em all out.)
• Online activists.
• Veterans.
• Gun owners and gun shops.
• Constitutionalists and libertarians.

Drone strikes are completely silent because the Hellfire missiles arrive faster than the speed of sound. You don’t even hear the missile until after the explosion. The blast radius of a Hellfire missile is 15 – 20 meters, and everything inside that radius is completely obliterated. This is more than enough to destroy entire homes, apartments and office buildings, not to mention vehicles and even light bunkers.

World Net Daily editor Joseph Farah actually voiced his concern about Obama being reelected, saying that he believed Obama would “kill journalists” if he won a second term. Farah is not being paranoid. He’s right on the money with where this is going. Copy and paste, to read his article this link,  http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obamas-2nd-term-war-on-domestic-opposition/   published right before the 2012 election.

[…]

I think Mike Adams sees this issue very clearly, will enough US citizens wake up to the warning bells ringing through his and Joseph Farah’s and many others including the Rand Paul Senate Filibuster to save what is left of the Republic? Or will the slow murder of the US Constitution continue to its last gasp with an ignominious endgame?

 

 

Scientifically Planned TV “Escapism” Educates the World through Fear and Melodramatic Emotional Anti- Life Programming Crime Dramas and Soap Operas

Scientifically tailored TV for every country and every culture in the world use ‘transitional’ characters, to educate the masses through melodramatic emotional anti-life programming Crime Dramas and Soap Operas.

TV entertainment is anything but harmless escapism. It is powerfully reshaping the entire world population’s minds,  embedding fear, distrust, and revulsion towards having children and family relationships.

 

Population Control Propagandist: “We Get Very Little Opposition From The Public”

[…] US-based Population Media Center, produces soap operas worldwide with the aim of reducing populations[…]

[…]The president of the Population Media Center makes clear: the strategy employed by the Media Center in its international programs is based on anincremental introduction of “reproductive health” issues. The justification given for its infilitrations: global agreements on population such as the 1994 Cairo Conference on Population, organized as part of Agenda 21. Ryerson explains (1:05):[…]“When we go into a country, we explain to them we are there to help them promote their policies”. Reason he gives for this statement: because those nation are signatories to global “agreements” like the UN population summit in 1994.[…]

 

This is top level propaganda , these educators and social scientific experiments in TV mind influences are anything but harmless escapist entertainments, as these professional professors attest in the above video.

 

To further cheapen the life value sensibilities of TV viewers of the world there are the ‘escapist’ violent Crime Dramas that present intimate examination of narcissistic  psychotic  personalities. How extensive are the effects that these have on normal minds, let alone upon unstable and or young minds, only heaven knows.

On TV: What makes serial killers so darn entertaining? Television » Big characters, escapism fuel proliferation of shows about multiple murderers.       By Scott D. Pierce, The Salt Lake Tribune
First Published Jan 30 2013

[…]”Part of what we do on television is provide escapism,” said Fox Entertainment president Kevin Reilly. “Escapism comes in many forms. It could be laughter. It could be fantasy. It is also your worst nightmare come to life.”[…]

[…]Give ’em what they want » It’s easy to place the blame for the proliferation of serial killers on producers and network executives, but the fact is that if viewers didn’t tune in, the shows would go away. Quickly.[…]

[…]”We’re in the business of being in people’s homes every week,” he said. “And if you don’t fall in love with those characters, if we don’t nail the core relationships at the heart of it, we’ve failed.”

Even if those characters are serial killers.[…]

 

 

 

Dr. Walter E. Williams, Ph.D. Explains the Second Amendment

Walter Williams: Americans misunderstand point of the Second Amendment [VIDEO]

Leaders with Ginni Thomas: Dr. Walter E. William

Walter E. Williams is the John M. Olin Distinguished Professor of Economics at George Mason University.

Williams, 76, has been teaching economics at George Mason since 1980. He is also an active political commentator, writing a syndicated column that appears in over 140 newspapers and sometimes serving as the substitute host for Rush Limbaugh’s radio show.

Williams views his role in the political arena as “rattling the cage” and being a “troublemaker.”

The Daily Caller’s Ginni Thomas recently spoke with Dr. Williams about taxation, out of control government, what he would say if he sat with President Obama, his view on gun control, his friendship with conservative intellectual Thomas Sowell, his desired legacy and much more.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/01/13/leaders-with-ginni-thomas-dr-walter-e-williams/#ixzz2I5JvNaR6

Aurora Shooter’s Four Perscription Bottles Seized in July Disclosed via Denver Post

rightsCourt Filing: Cops Seized Prescription Meds Belonging to ‘Batman’ Shooter SSRI connection to mass shootings ignored by media Paul Joseph Watson Infowars.com January 8, 2013

Alex Jones statement to Piers Morgan last night on CNN is confirmed that prescription drugs are factor in mass murders and suicides, see article by Paul Joseph Watson for further info on the below revelation printed by The Denver Post:

Aurora theater shooting: Cops took pill bottles from Holmes’ apartment Posted: 01/07/2013 12:01:00 AM MST Updated: 01/07/2013 10:20:09 AM MST By John Ingold The Denver Post Read more: Aurora theater shooting: Cops took pill bottles from Holmes’ apartment

http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_22323293/aurora-theater-shooting-%20cops-took-pill-bottles-from#ixzz2HOV1vYZw

CENTENNIAL — Aurora police seized four prescription bottles and immunization records when they searched theater-shooting suspect James Holmes’ apartment in July, according to newly obtained filings in the murder case against Holmes.
The disclosures come in a back-and-forth between prosecutors and defense attorneys over whether those items should be subject to doctor-patient confidentiality. The judge ultimately ruled in October that prosecutors could keep the items.

Holmes is charged with 166 counts of murder, attempted murder and other offenses in the July 20 shooting rampage at an Aurora movie theater that left 12 dead and at least 58 injured.

The documents — many of which are heavily redacted — do not reveal what prescriptions the bottles were for or whether prosecutors intend to use them as evidence.

Read more: Aurora theater shooting: Cops took pill bottles from Holmes’ apartment – The Denver Post http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_22323293/aurora-theater-shooting-%20cops-took-pill-bottles-from#ixzz2HOdbrXxc
Read The Denver Post’s Terms of Use of its content: http://www.denverpost.com/termsofuse

Piers Morgan Got Shellacked by Alex Jones

Piers Morgan got shellacked, he didn’t even land a glove on Alex Jones. Jones knew he had to talk fast and get as much information out as possible before they could cut him off so he came out swinging and never let up.

Alex has one thing on his agenda and that is to warn about the peril to freedom that is working night and day to destroy the United States of America. He did not have the luxury of being polite and ‘civil’ because that time has passed with green carded guests like Piers Morgan castigating and scoffing at our Constitution on CNN, and anti-gun legislation fomenting in the state of Illinois and the US Senate.

No, you are wrong!  I tell those of you who will criticize the emotional defense of our right to bear arms. Alex Jones should NOT have act otherwise toward the man who has been loathingly running down our country’s Second Amendment. Jones took the opportunity to look Piers Morgan in the eye and to speak plainly as a man with passionate love for freedom. Despite the fact that it was not smooth nor comfortable to watch, as Alex Jones was putting his heart and soul into every syllable he was able to get out in his Paul Revere like attempt to crack open the minds of the sleeping citizens of America to the real insidious pusillanimous attacks of Morgan and Senator Feinstein and all the others who wish the destruction of this Republic.

After he attempted to play the ‘spider to the fly’ to Infowar’s Alex Jones and not even being able to slur Jones because he couldn’t get a word in edgewise,  Piers Morgan bent over backwards being polite to Sheriff Arpaio after his out of control interview with Alex Jones.

He tried to make his same anti-gun argument, but got nowhere with Arpaio either, that Morgan was absolutely not able to make in his Jones interview because Alex was like a 1776 revolutionary front-line soldier defending against Pier’s Redcoat attacks upon his host country the USA’s  Second Amendment.

Piers Morgan’s vicious interviews with Arpaio and Pratt alone are evidence of how necessary Alex Jones’ handling of his own interview time with him truly was and how that was the only way not to be mocked and overrun and subjected to Morgan’s bully tactics. It was especially galling to Morgan for Alex to put on his condescending mock British accent in closing the second part of the interview which I think was the straw that canceled the third part of the show for debating with Alan Dershowitz (which Morgan went on with minus Jones).

 

Also notice that the White house communicated with Piers Morgan about making an official statement on that Petition to have him deported. It is transparent that the Jones interview upset the plan to marginalize the whole affair and it spurred them to respond at this very moment! Not a coincidence.

After the interview Alex Jones and Rob Dew filed this video reporting the reactions of CNN staff and Morgan and a Producer of the show being in a state of tears saying that it wasn’t supposed to ‘go this way!’

 

The interview that started the whole thing along with the White House Petition to deport Piers Morgan was with Larry Pratt of Gun Owners of America in which Morgan very, very, very rudely told Mr. Pratt, “You are an unbelievably stupid man” and continued on to make several outrageous charges and crassly and demeaning remarks as snidely as any below the belt hitting bully could. Yet Larry Pratt won that interview completely with calm determination and cool belief in his defense of the right to bear arms.