Judge: NSA’s collecting of phone records is probably unconstitutional
NSA collection of phone data is lawful, federal judge rules
Paul Joseph Watson
September 4, 2013
Current indications suggest that Congress could reject the Obama administration’s draft resolution on Syria, setting up a potential constitutional crisis if Obama goes ahead and launches the attack anyway, as Secretary of State John Kerry has clearly suggested will happen.
Exclusive: High Level Source Confirms Secret US Nuclear Warhead Transfer
Anthony Gucciardi & Alex Jones
September 3, 2013
“A high level source inside the military has now confirmed to us that Dyess Air Force base is actively moving nuclear warheads to the East Coast of the United States in a secret transfer that has no paper trail.
“According to the high level military source, who has a strong record of continually being proven correct in deep military activity, the Dyess Air Force Commander authorized unknown parties to transfer the nuclear warheads to an unknown location that has been reported to be South Carolina, where the warheads will then be picked up and potentially utilized.This is of particular interest not only due to the fact that the Syrian situation has escalated to the point of a very realistic hot war scenario, but due to the fact that Dyess has repeatedly denied the existence of nuclear warheads inside the base.
The brief report from the top level military source, which was written in a rush to get the information out, reads:
“Dyess is beginning to move out nuclear war heads today. I got a tap from DERMO earlier. He said it was the first time they have been even acknowledged since being put there in the 80′s. No signature was required for transfer… There was no directive. He said that Dyess Commander was on site to give authority to release. No one knew where they were going really, but the truck driver said to take them to South Carolina and another pick up will take them from there.”
The fact that this transfer was not signed for and there were no papers is key. It shows how the military is now secretly operating with the transfer of nuclear weapons, and what’s more, we know that DERMO (a military base in Florida) is a hotbed of special operations. Why is DERMO operating the nuclear warheads out of Dyess Air Force base with no paper trail? This shows that this is a highly secretive, black ops style move here that the military does not want on record.
The fact is that they don’t move all of these assets unless they plan on using them. Nuclear warheads are not simply moved to the East Coast for no reason, and the bottom line is that these missiles are likely being used for something even much greater than Syria.”
Live Update link above.
USA Officialdom Responses to Edward Snowden’s flight out of Hong Kong:
Infantile Sniveling Senator Chuck Schumer complaint about friends not being treated properly,
“Putin always seems almost eager to stick a finger in the eye of the United States – whether it is Syria, Iran and now of course with Snowden,” Schumer told CNN’s “State of the Union,” adding that China may have been involved as well. “Allies are suppose to treat each other in decent ways.”
Rand Paul, a true statesman patriot;
“They’re going to contrast the behavior of James Clapper, our national intelligence director, with Edward Snowden,” said Paul. “Mr. Clapper lied in Congress in defiance of the law in the name of security. Mr. Snowden told the truth in the name of privacy.”
Paul continued: “So I think there will be a judgment because both of them broke the law, and history will have to determine.”
Biden Warns: GOP Led By Two Young Senators, Ted Cruz and Rand Paul
6:44 AM, Jun 12, 2013 • By DANIEL HALPER http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/biden-warns-gop-led-two-young-senators-ted-cruz-and-rand-paul_735104.html
At a high-dollar fundraiser last night in Washington, D.C., Vice President Joe Biden warned his fellow Democrats about the Republicans.
“It’s a pretty simple proposition: The United States of America, and the state of Massachusetts, does not need another Republican in the Senate,” Biden told the assembled donors, according to the press pool report. “I’m being straight about this. This is not your father’s Republican Party. It really is a fundamentally different party. There’s never been as much distance, at least since I’ve been alive, distance between where the mainstream of the Republican congressional party is and the Democratic Party is. It’s a chasm. It’s a gigantic chasm.”In particular, Biden shared his distrust of two young Republican senators, Ted Cruz and Rand Paul.“I’m not talking about the character or even the quality of the minds of the people I’m going to mention. But the last thing in the world we need now is someone who will go down to the United States Senate and support Ted Cruz, support the new senator from Kentucky — or the old senator from Kentucky,” said Biden.
“Think about this. … Have you ever seen a time when two freshman senators are able to cower the bulk of the Republican Party in the Senate? That is not hyperbole.”
“On the gun issue, I don’t care what your position is — I called 17 senators out, 9 of whom were Republicans. … Not one of offered an explanation on the merits of why they couldn’t vote for the background check. But almost to a person, they said, ‘I don’t want to take on Ted Cruz. I don’t want to take on Rand Paul. They’ll be in my district.’
“I actually said, ‘Are you kidding? These are two freshman,’” Biden said, according to the pool report. “This is a different, party folks. They’re not bad guys, and they’re both very bright guys. And I’m not questioning their motive.”
There is no doubt in my mind that here we have the clear demarcation line of the forces aligned in battle for our Republic, namely the present powers in Washington DC made up of self serving Constitution dishonoring jackals ravening to tear apart what is left of US individuals’ Freedom.
Biden is no fool, he has eyes and ears to see who is the enemy of this rouge government made up of both parties Democratic and Republican old hand shaking deal making insiders.
I pray those who call themselves conservatives, progressives, and liberals in the United States of America will recognize the same and demand the restoration of our Bill of Rights and our Constitution.
What was the coercive act of parliament in 1774?
The Coercive Acts:
Also known as the Intolerable Acts or restraining acts, were enforced in the colonies in 1774 from England under the rule of King George III.
· These acts are a combination of the following: Boston Port Act, Quartering Act, Admin of Justice Act, and the Massachusetts Act.
· With the main port closed, colonies like NY losing gov. power, and the quartering act taking away rights of landowners, the acts urged the colonies to gather and assemble the first continental congress.
Listen to the sounds, the pounding on the door, the helicopter hovering, the barked orders to keep their hands up, and then the sound of spring birds chirping as this desecration of liberty unfolds surreality down the street into hundreds of families homes as Bostonians are forced from their homes in all states of dress and undress, many shoeless, most speechless and frightened out of their ‘sheltering in place’ homes that they’ve already been confined to in the operation’s edict to wait to be ‘rescued’ by the military/swat/police/authorities.
What King George III failed to do has been accomplished by our own ‘protectors’. Sad, sad, sad, portentous event, shameful for all the world to see this disgraceful drill acted out in the name of ‘safety and security’.
This was a seeming lark for these men, but make no mistake this was no harmless exercise.
Looking out your window and having this pointed at you was nothing less that martial law threatening you with your life if you dared to make a ‘suspicious’ move. ‘Freeze’! Is the implied command.
Your only course of action was to take your shoeless coatless children out into the street to be frisked and searched while the ‘protectors’ rifled through your entire home and belongings.
Saddest of all was the gratefulness Bostonians expressed toward the whole sorry affair…………
Bostonians, This Was Not Cool! Disgraced Desegrated Deflowered Defamed, Paul Revere is Turning in His Grave!
Note the ‘black capped’ man is dressed very similarly to the below ‘brothers’ of the Craft security corporation. The suspect in FBI video above bears striking sameness to them in all but his boots which aren’t khaki colored but dark colored instead. Now what’s up with that? And that raises another question in my mind of whether the above video could have been ‘blue screened’ onto the scene as they do in Hollywood movies. Hey, hey, what, what????
Also these changing threads to the stories are weaving the man in the ‘white cap’ into a relationship with the ‘brothers’ who are clearly involved with the Marathon security detail that is photographed repeatedly from numerous sources as being all along the Marathon route from start to finish, especially concentrated at the finish line!
And now we are told that the ‘brother’ in the ‘black cap’ is dead.
Well the story that ‘brothers’ one of which was first identified as being from India and of Islam belief, but now identified as being of Chechen Russian origin just keeps on changing. http://www.storyleak.com/media-flips-boston-suspect-sunil-tripathi-to-dzhokar-tsarnaev/
And now here is a set of ‘brothers’, from the security corporation, Craft, who are here at the Boston Marathon finish line for all the world to see in the photos of many ‘brothers’.
(But keep in mind that the AUTHORITIES have told us that we must not look at or pay any attention to any photos on the internets, but we must instead ONLY LOOK AT THE PHOTOS That they give us!) http://www.infowars.com/fbi-ignores-men-with-backpacks-at-scene-of-boston-bombings/
In 13 hour Senate Filibuster Rand Paul asks ONE question of Obama Administration.
“Do you have the Constitutional power to use a drone to kill a US citizen on US soil?”
“No.” Should have been the answer, but instead we get legalese that proclaims power to provisionally decide to kill a US citizen on US soil with a drone.
[…]The American “battlefield” doctrine and the NDAA
In defending the drone assassination powers of the President, you might hear language used that says drones will “only be used on the battlefield.” That seems to imply they will only be used in the Middle East, right?
Wrong. The USA has been legally defined as the new “battlefield” by the NDAA. That’s theNational Defense Authorization Act which also allows for the arrest and indefinite detention of American citizens without trial, without legal representation and even without them ever being charged.
The USA is the new “battlefield,” and when you combine the NDAA and the DOJ’s new drone killing justification memo, you now have the claimed legal framework for any American on U.S. soil to be arrested, detained, tortured or blown to bits without warning and without even a single shred of evidence being presented against him.
Yes, this is America today. Right now. You are living under a military dictatorship and most of you don’t even realize it yet. Even liberals and progressives are starting to wake up to Obama’s tyranny, by the way. On Democracy Now, Daniel Ellsberg recently described Obama’s actions as a “systematic assault on the Constitution.”
Who are the terrorists?
Of course, anyone who raises these points will be immediately dismissed with the claim that all this new power in the hands of the President will only be used “against terrorists.”
Okay, then who are the terrorists, exactly? It turns out they are YOU!
As Judge Napolitano recently explained:
The [Janet Napolitano DHS] memorandum said that people who are pro-life, people who believe in the right to keep and bear arms, returning veterans, people who think the government is too big and the IRS is too powerful, could be characterized as domestic terrorists. That could characterize two-thirds of the country. (Click here to see related video.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwJb5pbWhe4 […]
[…]All that is necessary to justify the murder of American citizens without trial is labeling them “terrorists” even with no evidence to support such a claim. The drone killings require no evidence. They only require the signature of one man.
Who is likely on the drone strike target list in the USA
So who is most likely to be assassinated by President Obama once drone strikes are fully unleashed in the USA?
• Political opponents.
• Anti-government protesters. (One Hellfire missile takes ‘em all out.)
• Online activists.
• Gun owners and gun shops.
• Constitutionalists and libertarians.
Drone strikes are completely silent because the Hellfire missiles arrive faster than the speed of sound. You don’t even hear the missile until after the explosion. The blast radius of a Hellfire missile is 15 – 20 meters, and everything inside that radius is completely obliterated. This is more than enough to destroy entire homes, apartments and office buildings, not to mention vehicles and even light bunkers.
World Net Daily editor Joseph Farah actually voiced his concern about Obama being reelected, saying that he believed Obama would “kill journalists” if he won a second term. Farah is not being paranoid. He’s right on the money with where this is going. Copy and paste, to read his article this link, http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obamas-2nd-term-war-on-domestic-opposition/ published right before the 2012 election.
I think Mike Adams sees this issue very clearly, will enough US citizens wake up to the warning bells ringing through his and Joseph Farah’s and many others including the Rand Paul Senate Filibuster to save what is left of the Republic? Or will the slow murder of the US Constitution continue to its last gasp with an ignominious endgame?
Joint Special Operations Command (JSoc): Obama’s secret assassinsThe president has a clandestine network targeting a ‘kill list’ justified by secret laws. How is that different than a death squad?Naomi Wolf guardian.co.uk, Sunday 3 February 2013 Read complete Naomi Wolf article.
Excerpts from her article (with my added emphasis);
[…]The film Dirty Wars, which premiered at Sundance, can be viewed, as Amy Goodman sees it here, as an important narrative of excesses in the global “war on terror”. It is also a record of something scary for those of us at home – and uncovers the biggest story, I would say, in our nation’s contemporary history.[…] […]I have often wondered, since I first wrote about America’s slide toward fascism linked here, what was driving it.
I saw the symptoms but not the cause. Scahill’s and Rowley’s brave, transformational film reveals the prime movers at work. The US executive now has a network of secret laws, secret budgets, secret kill lists, and a well-funded, globally deployed army of secret teams of assassins. That is precisely the driving force working behind what we can see. Is fascism really too strong a word to describe it?[…]
No Naomi Wolf, I don’t think that is too strong. I think rather that it may be too weak a term to call it! The strongest words seem inadequate to this extreme historical usurpation by rouge elements in the United States of American government of ALL the powers laid out in separate branches of government through the US Constitution.
Thank you, Naomi Wolf, for coming out with this and keep on speaking with courage, fear not these rouge elements, if we do not let them they cannot win. Quite acquiescence never saved anyone.
Leaders with Ginni Thomas: Dr. Walter E. William
Walter E. Williams is the John M. Olin Distinguished Professor of Economics at George Mason University.
Williams, 76, has been teaching economics at George Mason since 1980. He is also an active political commentator, writing a syndicated column that appears in over 140 newspapers and sometimes serving as the substitute host for Rush Limbaugh’s radio show.
Williams views his role in the political arena as “rattling the cage” and being a “troublemaker.”
The Daily Caller’s Ginni Thomas recently spoke with Dr. Williams about taxation, out of control government, what he would say if he sat with President Obama, his view on gun control, his friendship with conservative intellectual Thomas Sowell, his desired legacy and much more.
Article above linked details yet another physical action that regulates the USA under guidelines that originate from Rio Earth Summit UN Agenda 21. The goals signed upon by George H.W. Gush are being used even in the least populated areas of our country to the detriment of the humans who live on their private properties and just need to keep from freezing!
Our EPA’s far reaching new regulations now apply to burning of wood which is the most abundant source of energy in wilderness Alaska for keeping people from immediate freezing death!