Category Archives: Politics

UK Model of Selling Infrastructure Portrays US Future Sell Off to the 1%

Crystal ball not needed to peer into the future for “we the people” of the United States of America. All we need do it look to the condition of the people of the United Kingdom of Britain.

Their healthcare  the NHS being in tatters, and their pensioners being frozen out and forced out of their homes with bedroom taxes that make the escalating cost of heating fuel out of reach for them, and this next example of UK public schools and properties being given away for a pittance to private corporations and individuals who then sell them to the rich.

Here;  http://michaelrosenblog.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/gove-giver-schools-given-away.html

Monday, 13 August 2012

Gove the giver: schools given away.

This comes from the comments thread following an article about Gove’s maths curriculum plans:

first here’s the Guardian article itself:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2012/aug/13/michael-gove-maths-reforms-flawed-charity

Here’s the comment:

Gove once again distracting fromthe main point of his educatio reform – which is

In less than 18 months Michael Gove has transferred the title deeds of over 1900 English schools and the land the schools stand on to private companies

In less than 18 months OVER £1BILLION worth of title deeds now in the hands of the private sector

OVER £1BILLION state assets given away for free and accountants in the privatae sector cannot believe the government has also spent £481,750,000 in legal fees alone – nearly £HALF A BILLION in legal fees to transfer the title deeds of our schools to private companies

Now Gove has borrowed £half a billion – and we – the tax payers must pay this back – we the tax payers must pay the interest – to give away taxpayer owned assets to private companies

So when you pass the schools you paid to build, that you held the title deeds for – Michael Gove decided he wanted to give it away free

So who owns the schools now

In many cases Michael Gove has handed the title deeds to your school to Tory Party Members

Tory Party Member Mr Harris and his wife – they’ve been given the title deeds for lots of English schools and the land since Michael Gove became education secretary.

Now I wonder why Philip Harris and his good lady wife’s company has been handed the title deeds to taxpayer owned schools worth £100’s millions – Harris made donations to David Cameron as leader of the Conservative Party. He is considered to be one of his personal friends

Who else in the Tory Party is on the board of companies handed the title deeds to £100’s million of taxpayers title deeds to schools and land in England

Mr Stanley Fink – former banker and “god of hedge fund industry” — in 2009 appointed cop-treasurer of the Tory Party –

Fink previously donated £2.62m to the Conservative party

What has Stanley Fink got in return for being a member of the Tory Party and what return has he been given on his investment in the Tory Party

David Cameron gave him a seat in the House Of Lords immediately he came to power

David Cameron and Michael Gove have also gave his company the title deeds for schools and land worth, again, £100’s millions – via Ark Schools

Stanley Fink’s ark schools – state in their accounts – any “underspends” from their schools – the money goes to the Cayman Islands – via Stnaley Fink’s Ark Stockbrokers

So -Mr Gove – Let’s Talk Maths

When Tory’s are in charge of education –

How much did the goverment increase the deficit by just to pay for legal fees to transfer the title deeds of schools – we the taxpayers paid to build and which we owned – nearly HALF A BILLION to day in just 18 month

How Many members of the Tory Party now have the title deeds to the schools and the land ? – I’ve named just two, you tell us the rest

What is the Value of state assets Michael Gove and David Cameron have transferred from taxpayers – how much did the private companies pay for the assets (NOTHING)

How much have members of the Tory Party made from selling school land in the past 18 month (when they got it for free

How much money, from English Education funds, meant to be spent on Education of English children has been transferred to the Cayman Islands for the schools Tory Party Member Stanley Fink’s company controls

What is the total value of the schools and land so far (conservative estimates to date over £1billion – what’s the real figure Michael)

So when Michael Gove tells us children should read in Roman Numerals – Tory Party Members shake hands and congratulate themselves in abusing power in Goverment to transferring £1billion of state assets and Land to each other – that’s the only Maths Michael Gove is talking in England and they celebrate with champagne at how easy it all is

This year + ago blog post was found from comments upon ;  http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/cartoon/2013/oct/18/jeremy-hunt-nhs

ExuroPythonissam MysticFish

Hi Mystic

(old Cif posting from Scottish Lady, I think)

Probably this comment: ScottishLady comment (13 August 2012) Over £1 billion worth of title deeds are now in the hands of the private sector.

This rip-off of the century is being totally ignored by the media.

Why this conspiracy of silence?

I can find nothing in the Guardian (except in the comments sections) or in any other national newspaper.

Google throws up these, but they are hardly mainstream media:

Why is the media ignoring Michael Gove’s school privatisation bonanza? Liberal Conspiracy

£1billion of title deeds for schools transferred to private companies – IndyMedia UK

£1billion of title deeds for schools transferred to private companies – Mumsnet talk

Gove the giver: schools given away. (Michael Rosen blog)

Michael Gove and the school “Academification” process (blog)

further;

ExuroPythonissamMysticFish

Another post relevant to this from ScottishLady:

And of course when a school becomes an academy – who handles the teacher’s pension funds – hmm… would that be the private company – instead of the goverment

And then these companies also get their hands on £57 BILLION every year of taxes under the guise of an educaiton budget

Stanley Fink – his company states any “underspends” they transfer to a Cayman Ilsand fund (the money went into the ARk in £billions in £billions )

Of course Stanley Fink the Tory party treasurer has donated over £2 million to the Tory party – and Gove has handed his private company title deeds for schools and land worth at least £1i87million so far – not a bad return on your investment Stanley

 

Already the US has sold many toll roads, parks, and countless public properties to the Saudis, the Chinese, and who knows else? Our politicians now must endure lectures from our creditors (China’s ridiculing warning about our defaulting on their holdings of +trillion debts).

When we give the engine to pay the note can we drive our automobile to work anymore? It looks like the elite think they have the best chance of making all of us into their serfs once again. But I hope and pray that we will refuse their yoke of slavery.

Advertisements

Coal Power Clean Plants Threatened with Closure

The war against coal has over the years been made complex and confusing, and climate change that has been proven to be beyond anthropocentric (man centered) control, contributes greatly to the de-industrialization, jobs bleeding, and povertization of the USA.

 

Despite the debunking of man made global warming, see any number of scientific references here;

http://www.climatedepot.com/

there is an economic battle over coal that pits our need for affordable electric power against the profiteering carbon based trading industry that has effectively closed x coal powered electricity generating plants. http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/epa-powerplant-closures

http://www.americaspower.org/video

 

We have the coal, we have the need, we have the technology, so are we going to let the lights go out?

Wake up! In Proverbs 6:10-11, we are told,

“10 Yet a little sleep, a little slumber, a little folding of the hands to sleep:

11 So shall thy poverty come as one that travelleth, and thy want as an armed man.”

 

Here’s one more coal story, just one of thousands;

Coal-state Republican warns Obama’s climate plan could harm economy

http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/epa-powerplant-closures

Ted Cruz and Rand Paul Identified by VP Biden as Able to “Cower the bulk of the Republican Party in the Senate”

Biden Warns: GOP Led By Two Young Senators, Ted Cruz and Rand Paul
6:44 AM, Jun 12, 2013 • By DANIEL HALPER    http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/biden-warns-gop-led-two-young-senators-ted-cruz-and-rand-paul_735104.html

 

At a high-dollar fundraiser last night in Washington, D.C., Vice President Joe Biden warned his fellow Democrats about the Republicans.

“It’s a pretty simple proposition: The United States of America, and the state of Massachusetts, does not need another Republican in the Senate,” Biden told the assembled donors, according to the press pool report. “I’m being straight about this. This is not your father’s Republican Party. It really is a fundamentally different party. There’s never been as much distance, at least since I’ve been alive, distance between where the mainstream of the Republican congressional party is and the Democratic Party is. It’s a chasm. It’s a gigantic chasm.”In particular, Biden shared his distrust of two young Republican senators, Ted Cruz and Rand Paul.“I’m not talking about the character or even the quality of the minds of the people I’m going to mention. But the last thing in the world we need now is someone who will go down to the United States Senate and support Ted Cruz, support the new senator from Kentucky — or the old senator from Kentucky,” said Biden.

“Think about this. … Have you ever seen a time when two freshman senators are able to cower the bulk of the Republican Party in the Senate? That is not hyperbole.”

“On the gun issue, I don’t care what your position is — I called 17 senators out, 9 of whom were Republicans. … Not one of offered an explanation on the merits of why they couldn’t vote for the background check. But almost to a person, they said, ‘I don’t want to take on Ted Cruz. I don’t want to take on Rand Paul. They’ll be in my district.’

“I actually said, ‘Are you kidding? These are two freshman,’” Biden said, according to the pool report. “This is a different, party folks. They’re not bad guys, and they’re both very bright guys. And I’m not questioning their motive.”

There is no doubt in my mind that here we have the clear demarcation line of the forces aligned in battle for our Republic, namely the present powers in Washington DC made up of self serving Constitution dishonoring jackals ravening to tear apart what is left of US individuals’ Freedom.

Biden is no fool, he has eyes and ears to see who is the enemy of this rouge government made up of both parties Democratic and Republican old hand shaking deal making insiders.

I pray those who call themselves conservatives, progressives, and liberals in the United States of America will recognize the same and demand the restoration of our Bill of Rights and our Constitution.

Bilderberg Transactional Capital vs Stakeholder Capital, The Two Competing Power Philosophies Both Controlled by Elites

This introduction opens myriad issues of world powers using the world’s resources and peoples of this planet.   This video dispassionately lays out their two pronged one world order struggles.   Unlike my personal belief that there is good and evil in the world this Bilderberg group believes their brains and power grant them right of rule despite the methods they “must” use which involve manipulation of peoples, systems, and resources including deception, secrecy, theft, and brute power of war.

 

 

Bilderberg 2013: Andrew Kakabadse on How Elite Power Shapes the World
Tue, 04 Jun 2013,

Copy and paste into your browser to see this video;

Screen shot
Screen shot

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/interviews-videos/2831/bilderberg-2013-andrew-kakabadse-on-how-elite-power-shapes-the-world.html

 

 

The common denominator here in my humble opinion is that these two groups look upon themselves as being entitled to mold the world because of their brains to actually hold, take, and keep power and property.

It boils down to two philosophies of one world rule, both of which ignore and minimize individual rights and preclude benevolence and charity of the Biblical sense.  Right and wrong seem not to exist in this realm of world power play.

The philosophy of Communitarianism contrasted to Individualism is defined here; http://sociologyindex.com/communitarian.htm

The Anti Communitarian Manifesto
nikiraapana.blogspot.com/2008/04/abstract-anti-communitarian-manifesto.html
What is the Hegelian Dialectic? and The Historical Evolution of Communitarian Thinking by Niki Raapana and Nordica Friedrich, 2003, Seattle, Wyoming, Alaska.
Abstract: Background: Communitarianism is the theory that individual rights must be balanced against the rights of the “community.” Its many proponents insist that individual rights and liberties pose a real threat to the health and safety of the “community at large.” The founders of the Communitarian Network began “shoring up the moral, social and political environment” in the early 1990s. Today the communitarian theory is the basis for hundreds of new global rules and regulations eliminating individual rights, yet fewer than one percent of the affected population knows about it.
Results: The progression of recent history clearly shows a dedicated effort to lead the world into unknowingly accepting communitarian solutions. To understand how philosophical Communitarianism advanced itself, the authors traced it back to the original source. Using the works of the leading Communitarian theorists, they followed the path from Seattle Neighborhood Plans all the way to the International Court at the Hague.
Conclusion: The foundation for the communitarian theory is undisputedly the Hegelian dialectic; Part I, a tutorial on the Hegelian dialectic is fully substantiated by Jesuit priests, Renowned Marxists and Pope John Paul. Theoretical analysis, i.e.. (A) Communitarianism did not evolve naturally (B) and it was never a movement that arose out of U.S. society (C) therefore, communitarianism has no natural home in the United States., is further substantiated with 70 verifiable, solid references that overwhelmingly support it. Part II, also heavily referenced, outlines historical events leading to the global communitarian synthesis. The changing duality of the new legal system clearly indicates Communitarianism is a criminal enterprise whose aim is to destroy all legal institutions established under national and state constitutions. Both Part I and Part II establish the aims and shared goals of the lesser arms involved in the global communitarian insurrection, showing direct ties to the War on Terror business, the European Union’s integration under Communitarian Law, the emerging North American Free Trade Zone, UN Local Agenda 21, global sustainable development programs, Regionalization, Faith-Based Initiatives, Volunteer America, Community Oriented Policing, Rebuilding Community and Community Development.

 

 

Rand Paul Filibuster and Terrible Media Coverage

In 13 hour Senate Filibuster Rand Paul asks ONE question of Obama Administration.

“Do you have the Constitutional power to use a drone to kill a US citizen on US soil?”

“No.” Should have been the answer, but instead we get legalese that proclaims power to provisionally decide to kill a US citizen on US soil with a drone.

Mike Adams says,    http://www.infowars.com/its-now-clear-obama-intends-to-use-drone-strikes-to-kill-american-journalists-and-political-enemies/

[…]The American “battlefield” doctrine and the NDAA

In defending the drone assassination powers of the President, you might hear language used that says drones will “only be used on the battlefield.” That seems to imply they will only be used in the Middle East, right?

Wrong. The USA has been legally defined as the new “battlefield” by the NDAA. That’s theNational Defense Authorization Act which also allows for the arrest and indefinite detention of American citizens without trial, without legal representation and even without them ever being charged.

The USA is the new “battlefield,” and when you combine the NDAA and the DOJ’s new drone killing justification memo, you now have the claimed legal framework for any American on U.S. soil to be arrested, detained, tortured or blown to bits without warning and without even a single shred of evidence being presented against him.

Yes, this is America today. Right now. You are living under a military dictatorship and most of you don’t even realize it yet. Even liberals and progressives are starting to wake up to Obama’s tyranny, by the way. On Democracy Now, Daniel Ellsberg recently described Obama’s actions as a “systematic assault on the Constitution.”

Who are the terrorists?

Of course, anyone who raises these points will be immediately dismissed with the claim that all this new power in the hands of the President will only be used “against terrorists.”

Okay, then who are the terrorists, exactly? It turns out they are YOU!

As Judge Napolitano recently explained:

The [Janet Napolitano DHS] memorandum said that people who are pro-life, people who believe in the right to keep and bear arms, returning veterans, people who think the government is too big and the IRS is too powerful, could be characterized as domestic terrorists. That could characterize two-thirds of the country. (Click here to see related video.)    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwJb5pbWhe4   […]

[…]All that is necessary to justify the murder of American citizens without trial is labeling them “terrorists” even with no evidence to support such a claim. The drone killings require no evidence. They only require the signature of one man.

Who is likely on the drone strike target list in the USA

So who is most likely to be assassinated by President Obama once drone strikes are fully unleashed in the USA?

• Journalists.
• Political opponents.
• Anti-government protesters. (One Hellfire missile takes ‘em all out.)
• Online activists.
• Veterans.
• Gun owners and gun shops.
• Constitutionalists and libertarians.

Drone strikes are completely silent because the Hellfire missiles arrive faster than the speed of sound. You don’t even hear the missile until after the explosion. The blast radius of a Hellfire missile is 15 – 20 meters, and everything inside that radius is completely obliterated. This is more than enough to destroy entire homes, apartments and office buildings, not to mention vehicles and even light bunkers.

World Net Daily editor Joseph Farah actually voiced his concern about Obama being reelected, saying that he believed Obama would “kill journalists” if he won a second term. Farah is not being paranoid. He’s right on the money with where this is going. Copy and paste, to read his article this link,  http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obamas-2nd-term-war-on-domestic-opposition/   published right before the 2012 election.

[…]

I think Mike Adams sees this issue very clearly, will enough US citizens wake up to the warning bells ringing through his and Joseph Farah’s and many others including the Rand Paul Senate Filibuster to save what is left of the Republic? Or will the slow murder of the US Constitution continue to its last gasp with an ignominious endgame?

 

 

Senator Dianne Feinstein’s ultimate plan has always been to have Mr. and Mrs. America turn in their guns to the government, period.

Feinstein’s gun-grabbing legislation, see these articles:

http://www.infowars.com/video-dianne-feinstein-says-prepare-to-turn-in-your-guns/

Senator Dianne Feinstein’s ultimate plan has always been to have Mr. and Mrs. America turn in their guns to the government, period. Feinstein has admitted that the bill is about gun confiscation.

She tells us a gun ban is about saving the children and reducing crime, but her comments on 60 Minutes in 1995 reveal her true plan is to disarm the American people.

On Thursday, Feinstein will introduced her dream bill to disarm the American people. The legislation is open-ended and includes provisions to re-register firearms and submit the fingerprints of law-abiding Americans as if they’re sex offenders.

Feinstein’s bill will also include a buy-back provision that will allow the government to confiscate all firearms. Both Feinstein and New York governor Andrew Cuomo have said that is their plan.

It is a gun confiscation bill.

It’s no coincidence that the communist Chinese, the biggest holders of U.S. debt, have demanded the American people be disarmed. It is the simple action of the authoritarian.

 

More;

http://www.infowars.com/video-dianne-feinstein-says-prepare-to-turn-in-your-guns/

 

Is any of this getting through that false left/right paradigm? This is anti-USA, this is RED DAWN! WAKE UP!

 

Ron Paul on Big Government’s Power Grab in Wake of Disasters

The last thing the victims of Sandy need is more big government.

It is instructive to hear FEMA officials say that they have to take time to organize their rescue and aid programs to “make things go quicker”. Is that not an oxymoronic statement?

Their insistence upon control causes unnecessary delays and costs lives and much suffering while FEMA runs up and down the roads with clipboards making lists of what and where to go to work.

While the local communities and neighbors already know the needs and territories, they don’t have to stop up the works for days or weeks to be able to help clean and rescue and feed those in need.

Also read Aaron Dykes article;  http://www.infowars.com/as-society-unravels-in-wake-of-sandy-politicians-endorse-more-power-for-fema/

here.

(…)Mainstream media have echoed this uncritical endorsement, giving FEMA preemptive praise for its efforts in Sandy. ‘FEMA is the solution,’ and other bold claims are made to ensure the public does not break out of the illusion that FEMA is its loving savior.

But FEMA remains an agency capable only of a mismatched response, too slow to handle the most immediate needs to contain potential chaos, but always on pace for a gradual power grab after the fact, actually feeding off a greater disaster.

Once again, this bloated government agency can’t and won’t help the masses in a disaster. Yet politicians throughout the corporate-owned two party system are lining up to meet any request for FEMA funds, already approaching $12 billion plus, despite its track record of failure.(…)

(…)Congressman Ron Paul weighed in as a lonely voice willing to critique FEMA’s history of inefficiency and naked power grabs, while defending the centuries of local aid organized within the community in simply helping each other:(…)

PBS Sour Grapes ‘Climate of Doubt’

PBS again engaged in pseudo journalism, who is surprised? I call, ‘Sour Grapes’ on them and wish to heaven that both sides had been interviewed properly with the questions that were asked being allowed answered by the ones to whom they were put.

But no, instead we were given emotionalism, camera tricks, blurring of signature of a well respected physicist on a key document, Why did PBS FRONTLINE electronically alter the signature of one of the world’s most distinguished Physicists in their report “Climate of Doubt’? and editing of responses sequences and respondents to present a tale of woe once again have played into the hands of those who would de-fund PBS.  If this is their idea of quality broadcasting I believe they may have to suffer the withdrawal of support from the public purse.

The most egregious misrepresentation of the program to me is the 97 percent nonsense as this critique from http://blog.heartland.org/2012/10/thoughts-on-pbs-frontlines-climate-of-doubt-program/  here,  notes;

 The 97 percent nonsense. Hockenberry brought it up maybe a half-dozen times. Not once did he allow the many skeptics he interviewed explain why the stat is a joke (and it would have taken 8 seconds of air time). Hockenberry should be embarrassed to have bought the bunk enviro-left has been pushing with this fake stat. Would anyone else be able to get away with claiming the answer to a loaded question by 77 hand-picked scientists equals “97 percent of all climate scientists”? Heartland would never hear the end of it if we tried that. Our credibility would be shot, and rightly so. In fact, Hockenberry did take a swipe at our credibility with a criticism of the Oregon Petition and challenging questions to Fred Singer about it. Again, no such challenge to the alarmists about their 97 percent hooey.

Critique of PBS Frontline’s ‘Climate of Doubt’ by Jim Lakely on October 24, 2012

 

False Dilemma, Morton’s Fork, Hobson’s Choice, or Just Plain Blackmail and Extortion?

False Dilemma, Morton’s Fork, Hobson’s Choice, and/or Just Plain Blackmail and Extortion that the Elite  Puppeteers manipulate the voter to make in this quadrennial popularity contest for figurehead puppet of the United States of America is a concerted operation against the sovereignty of our fair country of which neither choice will bring the citizens any relief.

But as the first Tuesday in November looms closer the show must go on while the real rulers (central bankers and corporate heads) quietly pick our pockets and steal us blind and take our personal and civic liberties away one by one, at ever increasing speeds.

My eighty year old uncle who says pointing to the TV that is on all his waking hours, “This FOX channel is all the news I watch and the way these people think is the way I think it is.” Then he with genuine bewilderment asked, “So how in the world does Obama still have all this support?”

People have to eat and have a roof over their heads. 

I looked at him and told him that it has to do with the 47% government check dependent poor and especially the working poor who are not able to make a living wage who have full time jobs and still must have food stamps to feed their children and themselves. The social security dependents absolutely cannot get by without their meager checks and government medical programs.

Do the math.

When this 47% is added to the people (myself included) who hold absolute disgust for the greed and callousness of the rich class which represents the Romney GOP party leadership, which made it transparently clear that they would have their predetermined candidate Mr. Romney and no other.

They ran rough shod over Ron Paul and others to cheat them out the race through stealing the states of Maine and Michigan and ‘irregularities’ in Nevada, Missouri, Louisiana, and not a few other primaries in voter frauds and  other dirty tricks).

And Mr. Paul was either lead astray by some of his GOP campaign advisors, or he made for his own unexplained reasons, the poor choice to not challenge Mitt Romney directly in ads and debates, so some of the blame lies in that area as well.  Then the Elite Puppeteer’s owned main stream media outlets did the rest through their marginalization and ridicule of the chances Ron Paul the only one with crowds of all ages where ever he went.

Perhaps the Paul family is naive and have been too far inside the Washington DC Beltway too long. I would hate to find out that they were part of a deeper political game, nonetheless we have arrived at the GOP’s first choice an elitist religionist  practicing Mormon who deeply relies upon his faith that differs in the most important issues from traditional Christianity whose voters are now supporting Romney as, “the lesser of two evils” holding their holier than thou noses and voting ‘conservative’ GOP all the way down the ballot.

This leads me to ask whether this could be a repeat of McCain vs Obama when the GOP gave us the most unattractive Republican to insure charismatic Obama’s election?

As a mother I have lead my children to make the ‘right’ choice at certain times through  False Dilemma, Morton’s Fork, Hobson’s Choice, and/or Just Plain Blackmail and Extortion  for my ends, sometimes for my own self centered convenience and benefit, but mostly for the children’s best guidance, yet knowing that I had manipulated them into going my way rather than allowing them freedom to choose of their own accord.

There is good protection/parenting and then there is bad which is neither. Do not imagine that the Elite Puppeteers are so benevolent toward us.

 

Two stories illustrate:

 

#1

http://dailycaller.com/2012/09/24/full-audio-of-1998-redistribution-speech-obama-saw-welfare-recipients-as-majority-coalition/

By Charles C. Johnson

(…)The Daily Caller has obtained a complete audio recording of the October 19, 1998 Loyola College forum on community organizing and policymaking during which a future President Barack Obama said he favored the government redistribution of wealth. The audio demonstrates the context of that remark and reveals other far-left positions that Obama held as a state senator.

Those positions encompass issues as wide-ranging as gun control, universal health care and welfare reform. Obama also said he viewed welfare recipients and “the working poor” as “a majority coalition” that could be mobilized to help advance progressive policies and elect their champions.

Last week the liberal Mother Jones magazine published video footage, shot during a campaign event, showing Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney opining that 47 percent of Americans are captive Democratic voters because they receive government benefits without paying income taxes.(my emphasis)(…)

Video Link

 

#2

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0912/81584.html

Republican poll analysis: Romney winning with middle-class families

 

This #2 story misses the fact that these ‘middle-class families’ are falling out of that class every day through loss of jobs and inflation and loss of real estate value and shrinking opportunities for their adult children who are coming back to the nest after getting college degrees that lead to no job offers in their chosen fields who end up taking the low paying jobs they held while getting those diplomas in the first place.

So how will that work out in the numbers, Mr. Romney? What are the GOP going to do with that real life situation of the shrinking middle-class?

Mr. Romney has totally alienated that 47% he spoke of as being  captive Democratic voters , so how in the world does he imagine that enough of the 53% who have managed to stay off the food stamps and off public assistance, by the winds of changeable fortune, how could many enough of they who are close to joining and enlarging  the 47% vote for Mitt Romney who gives such short shrift and almost royal ignorance about their human plight?

Mr. Clinton’s campaign was right, “It’s about the economy, stupid!”

I’ll say it again,

People have to eat and have a roof over their heads. 

 

My considered mathematical prediction is that Obama wins unless there is another vote rig in Romney’s favor.

I will keep a clear conscious and either cast a vote for ‘Other’ or not vote at all, I haven’t decided quite yet, but I’ve grown too awake respond to these  False Dilemma, Morton’s Fork, Hobson’s Choice, and/or Just Plain Blackmail and Extortion choices any more. Face it citizens, this is election is nothing but a distraction for the Puppeteer Elite who are the real shadow government to finish the job of divide and conquer the USA into a state of chaos from which we will beg to be taken into their New World Order.

It is working very well, they hope, but their breakneck speed will be their undoing in the end, because evil divided will destroy itself. Just wait for it. There are “Other” choices.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Two Party System Sets US Into Perpetual False Freedom to Elect Change

Jesse Ventura gets a lot of freedom to tell whomever will listen that the two party system has for the past 20 years shut out any possibility of real change in government.

 

Interestingly he points out that 4 years ago there began US commercials  about Mormonism pointing out that the religion of our new ‘change’ agent choice, Mitt Romney,  is traditional family values incarnate.  And now it has been admitted within the Ron Paul campaign that their choice not to criticize Romney was made in Michigan for unexplained reasons. (???)

Headquarters of the GOP seem to have influenced someone in Paul’s camp not to go against their already chosen Romney. I surely hope it wasn’t Ron Paul himself, but in any case, we who supported him were burned by his hope of changing the GOP from within.

Now Jesse Ventura holds himself out for 2016, but, Hello! Who knows what will happen to our country by then? Will we have a voice of any kind by then?  Anyhow according to the rules of the illuminatti game the victim must always be told what is going to happen to them and as the saying goes, ‘The victim must invite the vampire inside.’ We have been told and told and told and told and told and told………………Frankly I wonder………………With ‘good’ Christians obsessing upon getting Obama out of office at all costs, are they just rushing into the foyer to admit the Romney vampire into the house?