British outsourcing giant Serco has managed to construct a corporate state running parallel to the governments in Europe, Australia and the US. Now they are lined up to oversee large compartments of Obamacare in the US.
Episode 5 of Sunday Wire Radio Show with host Patrick Henningsen aired Sunday Oct 6th…
This week’s theme: ‘Spies, Lies and Common Law’
This week THE SUNDAY WIRE talked with former MI5 whistleblower and author David Shayler, for a frank discussion about 9/11 and 7/7, as well as realities of Common Law in the 21st century, followed by regular contributor and punditBasil Valentine and his rant on elitists in Britain. The final hour we spoke with Brian Gerrish of the UK Column to discuss the shadow state in Britain and elite’s plans for a One World Government who are now constructing a corporate state in Europe and the US – this show is guaranteed to stimulate the mind! http://21stcenturywire.com/2013/10/07/episode-5-of-sunday-wire-radio-show-with-host-patrick-henningsen/
The war against coal has over the years been made complex and confusing, and climate change that has been proven to be beyond anthropocentric (man centered) control, contributes greatly to the de-industrialization, jobs bleeding, and povertization of the USA.
Despite the debunking of man made global warming, see any number of scientific references here;
[…]“We are looking through so much data that I think it makes our fight against terrorism worse,” Paul said.
Want to know how and why America has so rapidly come to resemble the totalitarian society described by novelist George Orwell in “1984,” one characterized by universal surveillance? It’s all exposed in a special issue of Whistleblower magazine – titled “ONE NATION UNDER SURVEILLANCE: Big Brother is watching in ways Orwell never dreamed.”
Paul has been an outspoken critic of the NSA’s massive surveillance program, which came under fire after the Guardian reported last week on the agency’s collection of phone records from millions of Americans.[…]
Edward Snowden Guardian’s interview one more source link;
This introduction opens myriad issues of world powers using the world’s resources and peoples of this planet. This video dispassionately lays out their two pronged one world order struggles. Unlike my personal belief that there is good and evil in the world this Bilderberg group believes their brains and power grant them right of rule despite the methods they “must” use which involve manipulation of peoples, systems, and resources including deception, secrecy, theft, and brute power of war.
Bilderberg 2013: Andrew Kakabadse on How Elite Power Shapes the World
Tue, 04 Jun 2013,
Copy and paste into your browser to see this video;
The common denominator here in my humble opinion is that these two groups look upon themselves as being entitled to mold the world because of their brains to actually hold, take, and keep power and property.
It boils down to two philosophies of one world rule, both of which ignore and minimize individual rights and preclude benevolence and charity of the Biblical sense. Right and wrong seem not to exist in this realm of world power play.
The Anti Communitarian Manifesto
What is the Hegelian Dialectic? and The Historical Evolution of Communitarian Thinking by Niki Raapana and Nordica Friedrich, 2003, Seattle, Wyoming, Alaska.
Abstract: Background: Communitarianism is the theory that individual rights must be balanced against the rights of the “community.” Its many proponents insist that individual rights and liberties pose a real threat to the health and safety of the “community at large.” The founders of the Communitarian Network began “shoring up the moral, social and political environment” in the early 1990s. Today the communitarian theory is the basis for hundreds of new global rules and regulations eliminating individual rights, yet fewer than one percent of the affected population knows about it.
Results: The progression of recent history clearly shows a dedicated effort to lead the world into unknowingly accepting communitarian solutions. To understand how philosophical Communitarianism advanced itself, the authors traced it back to the original source. Using the works of the leading Communitarian theorists, they followed the path from Seattle Neighborhood Plans all the way to the International Court at the Hague.
Conclusion: The foundation for the communitarian theory is undisputedly the Hegelian dialectic; Part I, a tutorial on the Hegelian dialectic is fully substantiated by Jesuit priests, Renowned Marxists and Pope John Paul. Theoretical analysis, i.e.. (A) Communitarianism did not evolve naturally (B) and it was never a movement that arose out of U.S. society (C) therefore, communitarianism has no natural home in the United States., is further substantiated with 70 verifiable, solid references that overwhelmingly support it. Part II, also heavily referenced, outlines historical events leading to the global communitarian synthesis. The changing duality of the new legal system clearly indicates Communitarianism is a criminal enterprise whose aim is to destroy all legal institutions established under national and state constitutions. Both Part I and Part II establish the aims and shared goals of the lesser arms involved in the global communitarian insurrection, showing direct ties to the War on Terror business, the European Union’s integration under Communitarian Law, the emerging North American Free Trade Zone, UN Local Agenda 21, global sustainable development programs, Regionalization, Faith-Based Initiatives, Volunteer America, Community Oriented Policing, Rebuilding Community and Community Development.
I wrote on this subject about a year ago and a fellow blogger made a comment that I agree with whole heartedly,
Susan says: May 2, 2012 at 1:16 pm (Edit)
Interesting “watchword” Muse. I wonder how their “happiness” compares with “the joy of the Lord”….? It seems their “world” is very “Orwellian”, in that whatever word they use, the opposite is the actual truth, so in this case “happiness” actually translates to be: MISERY
Happiness, it is always interesting to discover what the newest watchword is for the globalist push for all nations to join in the long term sustainable green economy global transition, there’s even a UN drafted Covenant that would supersede nations’ constitutions that includes Happiness as an avenue to convincing leaders of communities and cities regions and counties of the wisdom of their proposals.
International Covenant on
Environment and Development, Fourth Edition 2010
Marking First International Day of Happiness, United Nations Academic Impact
to Co-host Event on ‘Happiness, Well-being’ with Permanent Mission of Bhutan (a tiny, poor country with a very low GDP per capita, but ranked among the happiest nations in the world)
To mark the first International Day of Happiness, the United Nations Academic Impact of the Department of Public Information will host, on Wednesday, 20 March, 2013, a conversation on “Happiness and well-being: Essential for a sustainable future.”
[…]The day had a trending hashtag on twitter — #HappyDay — and its own website. DayofHappiness.net is led by Action for Happiness, an 80,000-member movement to promote happiness, and Cheers, a positivity and happiness app founded in Los Angeles.
“The U.N. declaring this day is punctuating a movement that’s been going on for a while,” says Farhad Mohit, founder of Cheers. “People are starting to question the way of measuring progress. More income doesn’t equate to more happiness – and it’s hard to argue with happiness, that’s not a bad goal.”
There was even a Hackathon for Happiness. The H(app)athon Project had people in New York, Indianapolis, San Francisco, Bogota, Tokyo, London and Oslo using the latest marketing technology to try and shift the world’s view of value away from gross domestic product.
“We want to create a personal happiness indicator that can teach people: You are worth more than money.” says John Havens, founder of the H(app)athon Project.
The International Day of Happiness was originally suggested by Bhutan, a country that uses the Gross National Happiness Index to evaluate their progress, rather than a gross domestic product (GDP) model.[…]
Now moving close to today we read Sunday, May 12, 2013,
article from United Nations Regional Information Centre for Western Europe
The UN and happiness
[…]Now why would the UN make a matter as private and subjective as happiness into a public and global one? And, why on 20 March? As with many a good fairy tale, the whole thing started with a king wanting the best for his country. In 1972 the king of Bhutan, a tiny and poor, yet happy Himalayan kingdom, grew tired of countries being measured by its gross domestic product solely, and coined the term Gross National Happiness (GNH).
Bhutan, a country with a very low GDP per capita, but ranked among the happiest nations in the world, then started efforts to put happiness on the global agenda. Last summer, the UN General Assembly unanimously adopted the resolution “Happiness: towards a holistic approach to development”http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=39084 , recognizing the pursuit of happiness as a universal aspiration embodying the spirit of the Millennium Development Goals.[…]
The UN and Happinessplan for we in the developed world is to mentally prepare us to embrace “a very low GDP per capita” such as “Bhutan, a tiny and poor, yet happy Himalayan kingdom”.
UN Agenda 21 wants an equally poor communitarian planet of nations going backward together into a “poor, yet happy” United Nations run world.
Comments from an attendee on of the April 23-25, 2012, Stockholm+40 by Alan AtKisson author of books, Believing Cassandra and The Sustainability Transformation, can be found on his blog; Alan Atkisson http://alanatkisson.wordpress.com/ .
International Day of Happiness, United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, Gross National Happiness
The Brussels based United Nations Regional Information Centre for Western Europe – UNRIC provides information on UN activities to the countries of the region. It also provides liaison with institutions of the European Union in the field of information. Its outreach activities extend to all segments of society and joint campaigns, projects and events are organized with partners including the EU,
All of the above entities are being taken over from the peoples they represent by those who want UN Agenda 21 to level and standardize the all nations into an equality of poverty and dependence upon those few 0.000001% who have formulated this definition of “Happiness”.
Central banks and global corporations own the UN, they ARE the UN (just one example, remember the $10 billion dollars that Ted Turner donated to the UN?), and they are guilty of causing the lion’s share of, ” “The economic crisis, accelerating environmental degradation and growing discontent around the world” that is being blamed upon the 99.999999% of humanity who have been lead into this moment of growing global MISERY.
If the UN Agenda 21 achieves its “Happiness” goals there will be MISERY as never before experienced upon this world…..but………I cannot imagine that this insanity could ever be pulled off, yes, some of it has already been begun…….but really……….you can fool some of the people some of the time………..No, I think UN Agenda 21 will go down as another Utopian nightmare, it’s just too unnatural, never gonna stamp out life and light.
Feminism 2.0 (Sheryl SandbergFeminist “Lean In” Author vs Anne-Marie Slaughter, Princeton professor and former top State Department official) Memes for Worker Bees
This represents a Hobson’s Choice. The absence of a third way, a traditional wife and mother role from this debate seems to assume that is an impossible or passe, old fashioned choice.
Sheryl Sandberg, Facebook, Silicon Valley executive manager and author of “Lean In”, sponsored, launched, or interviewed by
Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, at the offices of the Bloomberg Foundation, on East 78th Street, NY, NY
CBS Program, “60 Minutes”
“Makers,” a new documentary on feminist history,
Debora L. Spar, president of Barnard College, who invited Ms. Sandberg to deliver a May 2011 commencement address about gender in the workplace
Cosmopolitan magazine ( which is publishing a 40-page supplement to its April issue devoted to Ms. Sandberg’s ideas, and plan to spread her message to community colleges),
Jill Abramson, the executive editor of The New York Times,
Rachel Sklar, founder of a networking list for women in technology, who is on the Lean In launch committee,
and many other mainstream media outlets plus,
World Economic Forum in Davos, Ms Sandberg spoke on the topic at the World Economic Forum in Davos last month.
Sheryl Sandberg, “Women in management positions show less flexibility to move to other companies and new areas of responsibility than men, which hampers careers. Little American boys can imagine becoming president, but little American girls cannot.”
Anne-Marie Slaughter (Princeton professor and former senior adviser to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton)
Sandberg’s focus, women’s lagging ambition vs. men (“We will never close the achievement gap until we close the ambition gap,” she has said), “is a much, much smaller problem than our social and political structures,” Slaughter contends. Sandberg’s message, she adds, “isn’t taking account of the full spectrum of women who are not superhuman and rich. Sheryl Sandberg is both superhuman and rich.”
Atlantic Magazine article titled, “Why Women Can’t Have It All,” last year arguing that feminism — and Ms. Sandberg — were holding women to unattainable standards.
By Patricia Sellers June 25, 2012, “Is this a “face-off,”, as the New York Times proclaimed, between two elite, superstar women about what is right or wrong with workaday lives and careers? “It’s a debate about how we solve a common problem,”….. “Since then, both women quietly developed perhaps the most notable feminist row since Ms. Friedan refused to shake Gloria Steinem’s hand decades ago.”
Betty Friedan’s “The Feminine Mystique,” and Gloria Steinem’s MS magazine worked for the same goal, their methods squabbles not withstanding caused great upheavals of traditional human society were two sides to the coin of male/female work place relations, occupations, and personal relations.
(In a related development the Queen of England at age 86 has just this week announced her support for gender equality thereby opening up the throne to women succession. I wonder why the “old girl”, is doing this at this late date? Speculate, speculate, speculate………in any case there is only one crowned head at a time, not much room at the top…….anywhere in the world, is there?)
And finally that reminds me. There are few corner offices and even fewer penthouse offices for anyone to attain. So why train so many for the race to the top at all? Is it a question of conditioned obedience to the corporate model?
Yes, that must be it. I like honey quite a lot, but I’m not envious of those creatures at all, bee society doesn’t appeal to me in the least! But UN Agenda 21 proponents think the hive is grand. Yet that is a failed philosophy built upon a reprobate misunderstanding of the very nature of humans. In the end we aren’t bees and can never be contained in the planned communities Agenda 21 daydream.
What few women and men attain to the lofty goals of both Ms Sandberg and Professor Slaughter might examine whether the sacrifices they advocate to get to the CEO Suite give life meaning or simply lead to regrets of lost opportunities for more valuable experiences in the wider world of existence for the sake of breath itself.
I don’t believe many were meant to rule, the air is too thin for most up there on the top floor. Even if you reach Mt. Everest you can’t live there very long and would you, if you could……in any event it’s the climb and the companions that make for a successful contented happy life, and sometimes its the view, but often even that is obscured, then a kind word and a hot cup of coffee or tea would make all the difference……………
Scientifically tailored TV for every country and every culture in the world use ‘transitional’ characters,to educate the masses through melodramatic emotional anti-life programming Crime Dramas and Soap Operas.
TV entertainment is anything but harmless escapism. It is powerfully reshaping the entire world population’s minds, embedding fear, distrust, and revulsiontowards having children and family relationships.
[…] US-based Population Media Center, produces soap operas worldwide with the aim of reducing populations[…]
[…]The president of the Population Media Center makes clear: the strategy employed by the Media Center in its international programs is based on anincremental introduction of “reproductive health” issues. The justification given for its infilitrations: global agreements on population such as the1994 Cairo Conference on Population, organized as part of Agenda 21.Ryerson explains (1:05):[…]“When we go into a country, we explain to them we are there to help them promote their policies”. Reason he gives for this statement: because those nation are signatories to global “agreements” like the UN population summit in 1994.[…]
This is top level propaganda , these educators and social scientific experiments in TV mind influences are anything but harmless escapist entertainments, as these professional professors attest in the above video.
To further cheapen the life value sensibilities of TV viewers of the world there are the ‘escapist’ violent Crime Dramas that present intimate examination of narcissistic psychotic personalities. How extensive are the effects that these have on normal minds, let alone upon unstable and or young minds, only heaven knows.
[…]”Part of what we do on television is provide escapism,” said Fox Entertainment president Kevin Reilly. “Escapism comes in many forms. It could be laughter. It could be fantasy. It is also your worst nightmare come to life.”[…]
[…]Give ’em what they want » It’s easy to place the blame for the proliferation of serial killers on producers and network executives, but the fact is that if viewers didn’t tune in, the shows would go away. Quickly.[…]
[…]”We’re in the business of being in people’s homes every week,” he said. “And if you don’t fall in love with those characters, if we don’t nail the core relationships at the heart of it, we’ve failed.”
Agenda 21 has been actively engaged since 1972 in the usurpation of individual and private property rights which our United States Constitution protects. The Constitutional division of powers has a lengthy history.
Here’s more on the Deleware story; http://www.wnd.com/2012/04/police-state-fears-grow-in-delaware/
Police-state fears grow in Delaware
Law would strip sheriffs of all arrest authority
Delaware sheriff, Jeff Christopher, asserts that the erosion powers of the people’s elected sheriff has been “15 to 20 years in the making”
[…]over the years the sheriffs in the three counties voluntarily turned over most of the arrest authority to state police.
That was the status quo Jeff Christopher found when he was elected sheriff of Sussex County in 2010.[…]
Ending section of article, […]“We are directly answerable to the people, where the other police departments are not. The purpose of the sheriff is to defend and protect the rights of the residents of their county,” he said.
“They tried to pass a state law abrogating my powers but I told them no state law can supersede a constitutional office and the law’s authority as well as Biden’s opinion is invalid,” he continued. “There is a good old boys network that wants to give all power to the state police.
“I told them I was not going to abide by this since it is unconstitutional.”[…]
Here is another article published January 17, 2000, “Incrementalism on Steroids”, http://www.wnd.com/2000/01/6196/
by Geopp Metcalf
[…] the 10th Amendment is not yet
totally dead, atrophied, or in complete decay in the
United States. It is also significant in that it can/may, and hopefully
will be interpreted to mean that “political subdivisions of a State are
included within the meaning of the amendment, or that the powers
exercised by a sheriff are an extension of those common law powers which
the Tenth Amendment explicitly reserves to the People, if they are not
granted to the federal government and
specifically prohibited to the States.”[…]
“A news report has been quietly making its way around the alternative media, under the radar screen, concerning a Delaware legal decision to strip county sheriffs of their arrest powers in the state.
The mainstream media has not reported the story, but the son of Vice President Joe Biden, who serves as Attorney General for the state of Delaware, has issued a mandate to county commissioners informing them that sheriffs in the state’s three counties no longer have arrest powers.” Read more.
Piers Morgan got shellacked, he didn’t even land a glove on Alex Jones. Jones knew he had to talk fast and get as much information out as possible before they could cut him off so he came out swinging and never let up.
Alex has one thing on his agenda and that is to warn about the peril to freedom that is working night and day to destroy the United States of America. He did not have the luxury of being polite and ‘civil’ because that time has passed with green carded guests like Piers Morgan castigating and scoffing at our Constitution on CNN, and anti-gun legislation fomenting in the state of Illinois and the US Senate.
No, you are wrong! I tell those of you who will criticize the emotional defense of our right to bear arms. Alex Jones should NOT have act otherwise toward the man who has been loathingly running down our country’s Second Amendment. Jones took the opportunity to look Piers Morgan in the eye and to speak plainly as a man with passionate love for freedom. Despite the fact that it was not smooth nor comfortable to watch, as Alex Jones was putting his heart and soul into every syllable he was able to get out in his Paul Revere like attempt to crack open the minds of the sleeping citizens of America to the real insidious pusillanimous attacks of Morgan and Senator Feinstein and all the others who wish the destruction of this Republic.
After he attempted to play the ‘spider to the fly’ to Infowar’s Alex Jones and not even being able to slur Jones because he couldn’t get a word in edgewise, Piers Morgan bent over backwards being polite to Sheriff Arpaio after his out of control interview with Alex Jones.
He tried to make his same anti-gun argument, but got nowhere with Arpaio either, that Morgan was absolutely not able to make in his Jones interview because Alex was like a 1776 revolutionary front-line soldier defending against Pier’s Redcoat attacks upon his host country the USA’s Second Amendment.
Piers Morgan’s vicious interviews with Arpaio and Pratt alone are evidence of how necessary Alex Jones’ handling of his own interview time with him truly was and how that was the only way not to be mocked and overrun and subjected to Morgan’s bully tactics. It was especially galling to Morgan for Alex to put on his condescending mock British accent in closing the second part of the interview which I think was the straw that canceled the third part of the show for debating with Alan Dershowitz (which Morgan went on with minus Jones).
Also notice that the White house communicated with Piers Morgan about making an official statement on that Petition to have him deported. It is transparent that the Jones interview upset the plan to marginalize the whole affair and it spurred them to respond at this very moment! Not a coincidence.
After the interview Alex Jones and Rob Dew filed this video reporting the reactions of CNN staff and Morgan and a Producer of the show being in a state of tears saying that it wasn’t supposed to ‘go this way!’
The interview that started the whole thing along with the White House Petition to deport Piers Morgan was with Larry Pratt of Gun Owners of America in which Morgan very, very, very rudely told Mr. Pratt, “You are an unbelievably stupid man” and continued on to make several outrageous charges and crassly and demeaning remarks as snidely as any below the belt hitting bully could. Yet Larry Pratt won that interview completely with calm determination and cool belief in his defense of the right to bear arms.