I never thought I’d hear our beloved US Constitution coming up short against the likes of the defeated defunct disgraced disbanded USSR’s!
Here in the self declared “newspaper of record” the New York Times does that and more. It is of great interest that it attacks our Second Amendment right to bear arms and calls us out of step with the world and tells that our stance must be incorrect because we have only Guatemala and Mexico for company in the insistence to keep the ability for citizens to defend themselves.
Interesting especially now that our country is under threat from within not without of losing ALL INDIVIDUAL civil rights. Our Bill of Rights come under especial criticism in the article. Those same rights that are being wrested away from us in an ever increasing frenzy of midnight legislation passed without our Congressmen and Senators even reading their hundreds of pages of detailed usurpations of the liberties our founding fathers brought forth “in order to create a more perfect nation”. The Presidential arm of the three separate arms of our government has since WWII taken upon itself dictatorial powers to null and void the other two arms in edicts of Presidential Directives by capricious will alone.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Our US Constitution is bleeding and under great duress and being strangled by the neck. (Flag Code Section 8a. “The flag should never be displayed with the union down, except as a signal of dire distress in instances of extreme danger to life or property.”) This is our condition and most citizens go about daily life pursuing their individual happiness in ignorance.
This Republic is not ended as the NY Times wants it to be in the article linked below, but it is being attacked in the most subtle ways every day and now in this most vicious and slanderous manner. The very idea that our US Constitution protects “relatively few rights” is preposterous!
The United States Constitution is terse and old, and it guarantees relatively few rights. The commitment of some members of the Supreme Court to interpreting the Constitution according to its original meaning in the 18th century may send the signal that it is of little current use to,
We had better refer back to our founding fathers behaviour and protect our liberties now while we still have breath or our children will live under the rule of tyrants whose god will be honored by force. These disrespecters of our US Constitution mean to put it into the ashcan of history. Here is their opinion of it;
“Of course,” Justice Scalia continued, “it’s just words on paper, what our framers would have called a ‘parchment guarantee.’ ”
Read the entire blasphemous article here; http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/07/us/we-the-people-loses-appeal-with-people-around-the-world.html?_r=2&partner=MYWAY&ei=5065